The dispute over who won the 2024 state Supreme Court election ended after a six-month court struggle, but the ramifications ...

The North Carolina Supreme Court is rehearing arguments in a redistricting case it ruled on in December, when Democrats held a 4-3 seat advantage on the court that now has a Republican majority.

As Democrats look to the midterms, defending the few state-level judicial seats they hold is a top priority. They only hold ...

The election was in November, and North Carolina still has not officially declared a winner as the race has been upended by ...

The Supreme Court has ruled that state courts can act as a check on their legislatures in redistricting and other issues affecting federal elections. The court rejected arguments by North Carolina ...

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a North Carolina gerrymandering case, with some state lawmakers seeking a favorable interpretation of the "independent state legislature" theory.

Supreme Court races in North Carolina were nonpartisan affairs until the Republican legislature ordered candidates to run as partisans, with R’s and D’s beside their names on Election Day ...

The North Carolina Supreme Court election was held in November, but unlike all the other races held that day, it is still undecided more than four months later. The race for a seat on the Tar Heel ...

The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday about whether North Carolina lawmakers could help defend a voting law with the state attorney general.

In February 2022, North Carolina’s Supreme Court ruled that the state’s new congressional and state legislative maps violated the state Constitution, which the court interpreted to prohibit ...

This dispute was another indicator not just of the deep divisions on North Carolina’s Supreme Court, which went from a 4-3 Democratic majority to a 5-2 Republican one after elections last year ...

North Carolina’s Supreme Court reversed itself Friday on partisan gerrymandering, ruling 5-2 that it poses “nonjusticiable, political questions.” Last year a 4-3 court said the opposite.