This first installment will discuss how to understand arguments in the logical reasoning section. In questions involving arguments, you will often see the LSAT refer to the "argument" or the ...

The logic behind argument: Coming face to face with fallacies An argument is considered valid if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false.

The biggest lie those who create and spread misinformation perpetrate is that they want you to think for yourself. They warn their target audience not to be “sheep” and not to let themselves be told ...

While the questions themselves involve made-up arguments and the answer choices vary in wording, the flaws in the reasoning are often common logical fallacies studied since antiquity.

Sometimes considered a type of red herring – a logical fallacy that uses unrelated information to redirect away from the argument's flaws – whataboutism is intended to distract attention.

The quality of each argument in a thread varies from comment to comment, with respect to credibility, relevance, logical strength, the balance of evidence, and the level of bias.

Logical reasoning: An antidote or a poison for political disagreement? Date: April 18, 2019 Source: Society for Personality and Social Psychology Summary: New research exploring American liberals ...

More than 75 percent of LSAT logical reasoning questions will contain an argument. For purposes of the LSAT, an argument is a conclusion supported by premises. In questions involving arguments ...