Why is Christian Science in our name? Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that. The Church publishes the Monitor ...

Are you a print subscriber? Activate your account. By John Dioso - 17 hours 8 min ago By John Dioso - 18 hours 31 min ago 20 hours 10 min ago By Ad Age Staff - 20 hours 17 min ago By Keira Wingate - ...

More than 3,000 parents join Facebook page opposing new Pampers diapers. May 3, 2010 -- Never underestimate the power of a protective parent. Rosana Shah said that when her daughter broke into a rash ...

CINCINNATI -- Four women who blog about consumer products for young families spent Thursday talking about diapers with Procter & Gamble Co. officials and advisers as the company fights online ...

MINNEAPOLIS — Even companies that sell $9 billion worth of diapers have to respond when angry mothers post photos of their babies’ irritated bottoms on Facebook. Pampers officially rolled out its “Dry ...

Regulators have been unable to verify complaints that Procter & Gamble’s Pampers diapers leave children with severe rashes, the Consumer Product Safety Commission said Thursday. Tests on Pampers Dry ...

Pampers' much-hyped diaper redesign called Dry Max has parents from coast to coast furious as complaints continue to roll in about the diapers causing what is described as a chemical burn or severe ...

I noticed the other day that my daughter back was very red. The next day there had appeared to be a small blister that had been poped. Today it looks like this. I found out that it is a chemical burn.

Two agencies investigating claims that Procter & Gamble Co's Pampers Dry Max gave children severe diaper rash reported Thursday that they have found no specific cause linking the diapers to rashes.

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Procter & Gamble Co is being sued by parents claiming new Pampers diapers have caused severe rashes and other skin conditions on their children, court documents showed, assertions ...

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a class-action settlement that would have paid the lawyers who negotiated it $2.73 million, absolved Procter & Gamble of any future liability, and handed $1 ...