Learn about protectionism and its tools like tariffs, quotas, and subsidies, used to shield domestic industries and impact ...

For example, the United States, Mexico and Canada are members of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which slashed protectionist barriers among the three countries.

Free Trade Vs. Protectionism. With market globalization, industrialized and developing nations have embraced free trade as a means for opening markets and reducing consumer prices.

Should the trade policy of the United States include additional tariffs or support free trade? Provide examples and details from the video clips.

But it’s not true that free trade necessitates political globalization. The EU, for example, has a body of treaties and legislation that affect the laws of its member states.

In a changing world, nations that share a bond—especially a bond as strong as that shared by the U.K. and the U.S.—must look to strengthen that bond and deepen ties with one another.

The growth- and income-boosting economic ties between the U.S. and Switzerland offer a practical example of the value of international trade and investment.

The most common genres of free trade criticism today revolve not around it’s average effect, but the claim that free trade creates winners and losers. While these trade critics think it is ...

Politicians and industry leaders have long pushed to remove barriers to interprovincial trade. Trump’s tariffs are giving the effort new momentum.

Free trade agreements, many of which are bilateral, are arrangements in which countries give each other preferential treatment in trade, such as eliminating tariffs and other barriers on goods.

Enemies of free trade talk a good game about being on the side of the common person. But laws are made by the elite, and when trade is limited by law, the limits will be shaped to benefit the elite.