Interpretation of exemption notifications under Indian tax legislation has always been at the forefront of debates. A tax law ...

Parmar (Jain), the Bombay High Court addressed an appeal concerning alleged bogus purchases. The Revenue argued that the ...

In the case of Satya Prakash Singh Vs State of Jharkhand, the Jharkhand High Court addressed the issue of anticipatory bail ...

CENTRAL TAX on January 23, 2025, implementing a decision from the 55th GST Council meeting regarding the waiver of late fees ...

2. The above declaration shall have to be filed separately for each ”.

DCIT, the Bombay High Court examined the legality of reopening assessments under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Bennett ...

In the case of Charu Modi Bhartia Vs DCIT before the ITAT Delhi, the tribunal overturned a penalty levied under Section 271(1 ...

According to Notification No.8/2025-Central Tax dt. 23.01.2025, even if there is a delay in the filing of Form GSTR-9C, provided it is filed on or before 31.01.2025, the late fee will be restricted to ...

In view of the above, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the impugned order passed by the respondents is in violation of ...

ITAT Ahmedabad held that non-compliance to notices issued u/s. 250 by CIT (A) resulted into delayed appellate proceedings. Accordingly, cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed on the assessee for lack of diligence.

NCLAT Delhi held that initiated proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal does not preclude Financial Creditors to take remedy under Section 7, which is a special remedy provided under the IBC.